John not listening

One Man's Web > Politics
and Ethics > Iraq War > John
not listening
March 7 2003
On Feb 12 Ian McPhederan posted the story "Retired defence chief hits `madness'"
Former Chief of Defence Admiral Alan Beaumont accused the Government of "madness" in pursuing war against Iraq.
He said there was no justification for war without UN backing and little justification with it.
Beaumant claimed he had discussed the war with "about 30 former top
brass" reporting "No one I know supports the Government's position, not
one."
The Australian defence chief during the Gulf War, General Peter Gration, warned war without the UN could lead to a breakdown of the world
order and Returned Services League national president, retired Major General Peter Phillips, said: "Without UN backing we shouldn't be going."
The RSL usually seems pretty gung ho on these things, and tends to be
socially conservative like the PM.... maybe John ought to listen when all the
professionals are so cool (to put it mildly) on the idea of going to war!
This was reported in the Advertiser
Website on Feb 12 2003. In today's Advertiser a month later, and on the News
Website John Howard is headlined as saying we could attack Iraq without the UN
Patrick Walters and Roy
Eccleston report he has "dismissed the need for a second UN resolution
despite growing international dissent over US determination to topple Saddam
Hussein." They report China, France, Russia and Germany all reject military
action. He claims the war would be "legal even without UN backing."
This reminds Jan of the schoolyard kids lining up behind the bully, despite the
school rules. We all know that even if the bully sorted some real shit of
a kid, the teachers never sanctioned that behaviour. The ends do not
justify departing from the established order. And that's even if the bully
is not out to steal the kid's oil, sorry, lunchbox.
Howard says, "Let me make it very clear to this parliament that this
Government will never act in breach of international law. I want to make
it clear that any action we take will be action we regard as being consistent
with international law."
Jan think that is doublespeak for "we will define international law to suit
us, so we can keep sucking up to Uncle Sam."
Leader of the House, Tony Abbot promised that
"This parliament will have a vote before Australian forces go into action
in Iraq, if it comes to that." Will Labor have the guts to stand up
to them, and are there enough Liberals who have guts and conscience to cross the
floor and stay out of the madness? One imagines Howard will not try this
in the Senate, where he would be outvoted.
Meanwhile, the people still beg to differ with John. The major regional
city of Wollongong
(News link live 7/3/2003) has decided to defect to France in protest. An alliance of
the city council, employers and unions- now that is a broad base plans to
appeal to the Consul General of France to allow its municipality to 'defect' in
protest at the Federal Government's Iraq stance .
A Wollongong delegation including no less than the Lord Mayor Alex
Darling, is making the request of the Consul General of France in Sydney next
Tuesday. He is reported as saying "I
believe one of the most effective things we can do is to initiate an urgent
campaign of faxes, emails and other expressions of support ... to urge France to
exercise their veto." And Jan, along
with other Australians wonders about Canada. With the longest unarmed
border in the world with, yes, the USA, Canada seems to have no need to suck up
to the world's superpower. On the ABC's World Today program John
Highfield (link live
7/3/2003) commented "Even as we've been
hearing today of John Howard Government support for the Bush administration and
its policy on Iraq, across the northern border of the United States, in Canada,
there the government has a very different position. The Canadian government is much closer to the European position, firmly against
military action unless there's United Nations backing for it." Canadians
are much more like us Aussies than the Yanks. We have a similar
heritage. So why is little Johnny so keen to be a junior American when the
Canadians have found no need to kowtow to their neighbour?
Meanwhile, back in Adelaide, 7,000 students left school and marched against the
war. They stated the obvious, "Of course this is not supporting
Saddam Hussein," something John doesn't want to hear. My 16 year old
son went back to school, and arrived at work hours later still stoked.
Kid's aren't as staid as us oldies. Not much of this "No war, No
war" chanting for them, he reported. "Howard's a wanker,
Howard's a wanker!" was the cry. And "Howard's a
fuck-wit." And Jan wonders if out of the mouth of teenagers there
might not come the truth!
Use of Nicholson's cartoons is
free in a non-profit
situation. Please see his website http://www.nicholsoncartoons.com.au
for exact details.
One Man's Web > Politics
and Ethics
|